Tuesday, August 3, 2010

The Big Bang Theory and the Cosmic Crunch in the Noble Quran:

AUDIOs from Dr. Zaghlool Al-Najjar


Lack of Oxygen and low air pressure in space.


The constant reduction of earth's size: The earth used to be
200 times bigger!


The location of the lowest land on earth.


Iron was sent down to earth from space.



The origins of the Universe, Big Bang theory, Cosmic Crunch, and
the creation of the SECOND EARTH after the second Big Bang in the Noble Quran
and Science.
Also, Dr. Zaghlool's scientific explanation of the earth
and heaven coming to Allah Almighty "willingly or unwillingly" and how each
celestial object behaves differently depending on its mass.


The Cosmic Crunch and the creation of the second Universe
and second earth.


Time and the Speed of Light precisely
calculated and mentioned in the Noble Quran.


Is it possible for the sun to rise from the West and for the
moon to be swallowed by the sun relatively quickly?

See what Western
Scientists say about this.



Please also visit:


The Miracle of the Space Fabric - Mentioned in the Glorious Quran and confirmed by Science.








The Big Bang Theory and the Cosmic Crunch in the Noble Quran:


The sections of this article are:


1- The Universe was formed from hot gaseous in the Noble Quran.

2- The Bible never mentioned anything about the formation of the
Universe.
3- Articles and links of official web sites that
confirm the Noble Quran's claims.
4- When the Cosmic
Crunch to the Universe occurs, the Day of Judgment shall come.
Prophet Muhammad predicted that the Sun will rise from the West.






1- The Universe was formed from hot gaseous in the Noble Quran:


Let us look what Allah Almighty said about the Universe in the Noble Quran:


"Moreover He comprehended in His design the sky, and it had been
(as) smoke
:
He said to it and to the earth: 'Come ye together,
willingly or unwillingly.' They said: 'We do come (together), in willing
obedience.' So He completed them as seven firmaments in two Days, and He
assigned to each heaven its duty and command. And We adorned the lower heaven
with lights, and (provided it) with guard. Such is the Decree of (Him) the
Exalted in Might, Full of Knowledge. (The Noble Quran, 41:11-12)"


"Do not the Unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were joined
together (as one unit of creation), before we clove them
asunder?
We made from water every living thing. Will they not then
believe? (The Noble Quran, 21:30)"


The Arabic word for "sky" in Noble Verse 41:11 above is "samaa", which is the
same word used for "heaven" and "Universe". Since the 7 heavens didn't
exist yet (because the seven firmaments or heavens were mentioned in the next
Noble Verse 41:12), then this CLEARLY MAKES the "samaa" be referring to the
Universe, since the heaven was the entire Universe when GOD Almighty
"comprehended in His design the sky". He then later divided it into seven
firmaments or heavens.


Anyway, as we clearly see above in the Noble Verses, Allah Almighty initially
created the Universe or the "samaa" with smoke (Dukhan). Dukhan in Arabic
refers to the smoke coming from fire, which is always HOT GAS.


ch1-1-c-img1.jpg (12269 bytes)


A new star forming out of a cloud of gas and dust (nebula), which is one of
the remnants of the "smoke" that was the origin of the whole
universe.
(The Space Atlas, Heather and Henbest, page 50)
Allah
Almighty said: "Then He turned to the heaven when it was
smoke...(The Noble Quran, 41:11)"
The Noble Quran on
the Origin of the Universe

Only Islam claims that the universe was
originated from Dust and Hot Gas, or Smoke.


Now as to Noble Verse 21:30 above, according to the Big Bang Theory, the
Universe experienced an unbelievable explosion from the hot gases that were
forming it, which caused the Universe (which consisted of the ball of gases) to
split and expand. The Earth was separated then from the gaseous mass that
was forming the Universe. The gases according to the scientific articles
below in this article made "the universe be consisted of compact ball of
hydrogen -- protons, neutrons, electrons, and their anti-particles -- plus
radiation. There were not differentiated planets, stars, suns, galaxies.
Five billion years ago, the compact hydrogen soup blasted apart with huge
force, matter was hurled in all directions, and the universe doubled in
size. This expansion of the universe is still going
on.
" [taken from "Ask Yahoo" web site at http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20001027.html]


It is really interesting to know that the Big Bang Theory suggests that the
Universe is still expanding until today, because this is EXACTLY what Allah
Almighty also claimed in the Noble Quran:


"And the firmament, We constructed with power and skill and verily
We are expanding it. (The Noble Quran, 51:47)"


Again, the word "samaa" was used for "firmament". "samaa" as I
mentioned above means either "heaven", or "Universe" depending on how it is
used. Certainly, the meaning of the word "samaa" in Noble Verse 51:47 is
"Universe".


Please visit How
could Allah create the world in 6 days if science has proved that the world and
universe took millions of years to make?


Also, since Allah Almighty didn't have any names for the explosive gases
(such as hydrogen) 1400 years ago, He summed them up by calling them "smoke
(dukhan)", which is literally a hot gas. Smoke is also ball-shaped and
compacted together while it is hot and in the air. This description
perfectly fits what the big bang theory suggests from the shape of the "compact
ball" of gases that formed the Universe.




2- The Bible never mentioned anything about the formation of
the Universe:


No where in the Bible do we see any mention of the creation of the
Universe. The Bible lacks a great deal of information about how GOD
Almighty created things.




3- Articles and links of official web sites that confirm the
Noble Quran's claims:


The following links and article prove that the Big Bang Theory existed in the
Noble Quran 1400 years ago.


http://www.themodernreligion.com/verses_sci.htm


http://hepwww.rl.ac.uk/pub/bigbang/part1.html This page
has "Next" button at the bottom of it which continues with the next pages.


http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry//ask/acosmexp.html


http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/features/news/21nov00.html


http://www.er.doe.gov/feature_articles_2001/June/Decades/38.html



The following article was taken from http://ask.yahoo.com/ask/20001027.html


Note: The underlined in dark green words prove that the Universe was
originally formed by hot gaseous.






Dear Yahoo!

What exactly is the Big Bang Theory?


Gigi
Atlanta, Georgia



Dear Gigi:


The Big Bang Theory is currently the dominant scientific explanation for the
origin of the universe. It was first proposed in 1927 by a Belgian priest named
George Lemaître.


We found a collection of sites about the Big Bang theory in a Yahoo!
Astrophysics subcategory called Universal Origins by searching on "big
bang
." This mind-boggling array of resources proved a little too scientific,
so we tried to find a simpler place to start.


A fascinating physics study module called Violence in the Cosmos provided us with some Big Bang
basics:



  • Ten to twenty billion years ago, the universe consisted of a compact ball
    of hydrogen -- protons, neutrons, electrons, and their anti-particles -- plus
    radiation. There were no differentiated planets, stars, suns, galaxies
    .
  • Five billion years ago, the compact hydrogen soup blasted apart with huge
    force,
    matter was hurled in all directions, and the universe doubled in
    size. This expansion of the universe is still going on.
  • The blast caused a major decrease in the density and temperature of the
    universe after which no new particles could be formed. Then the particle wars
    began. Particles and anti-particles fought it out in a frenzy of
    self-destruction. The universe was left with a greatly reduced collection of
    positively-charged nuclei and negatively-charged electrons in a vast plasma
    soup.
  • Although plasma (ionized gas) rarely occurs on Earth's electrically neutral
    surface, 99% of the matter of the Universe still exists in a plasma state.
  • The Big Bang produced the light elements hydrogen and helium. Heavier
    elements are usually produced in the violent processes associated with the death
    of stars.

Despite later discoveries by astronomer Edwin Hubble and Nobel Prize-winning
scientists Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson that appear to support Lemaître's
theory, the theory remains controversial and alternative explanations for the
origin of the universe abound.



The following article was taken from http://www.cosmiverse.com/space122204.html


Big Bang Theory - Proof at
Last

December 22, 2000 07:45 CDT

For the first time, an actual measurement has
been made of the temperature of the cosmic microwave background radiation, at a
time when the Universe was only about 2.5 billion years old. A team of
astronomers from India, France and ESO achieved this fundamental and very
difficult observation by obtaining a detailed spectrum of a quasar in the
distant Universe, using the UV-Visual Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) instrument at
the ESO 8.2-m VLT KUEYEN telescope at the Paranal Observatory.


Most astrophysicists believe that the Universe was formed in what is known as
the Big Bang. If this were true, the glow of this primeval fireball should have
been warmer in the past - which is exactly what they found by the new
measurements.


According to a recent press release by the European Southern Observatory:
This analysis of the VLT spectrum of the distant quasar not only gives the
definitive proof of the presence of the relict radiation in the early Universe,
it also shows that it was indeed significantly warmer than it is today, as
predicted by the theory.


American physicists Arno A. Penzias and Robert W. Wilson, who were rewarded
with the Nobel Prize in 1978, discovered the primeval fireball's relict
radiation. Their discovery was made in 1964 by means of radio observations.
Precision measurements by the COBE satellite later showed that this ancient
radiation fills the Universe, with a present-day temperature of slightly less
than 3 degrees above zero.


This radiation comes from all directions, yet it is extremely uniform. Slight
temperature variations in different directions have been measured most recently
by means of detailed observations from a balloon above Antarctica (the Boomerang
experiment).


Since the universe is expanding, it must have been denser in the past. A
particular prediction of the Big Bang theory is also that the temperature of the
CMBR must have been higher at earlier times. However, although quite a few
attempts have been made, no clear observational confirmation of this has been
possible so far. In fact, the best observations until now have only been able to
establish upper limits to the cosmic temperature at earlier epochs.


It was actually suggested more than 30 years ago that observing specific
absorption lines in the spectra of distant quasars could test the predicted
increase of temperature with distance (redshift).


The idea is simply that at earlier epochs, the CMBR was hot enough to excite
certain atomic levels, and thus to give rise to particular absorption lines in
the spectrum of a celestial object.


Some faint absorption lines of neutral carbon atoms were found to be
especially promising, in the sense that they were predicted to be very sensitive
to the surrounding temperature. However, previous generations of (smaller)
astronomical telescopes were unable to achieve spectra of sufficient quality of
these faint absorption lines in faint and remote objects in the early (more
distant) Universe.


The advent of 8-m class telescopes has now changed this situation. A few
years ago, the 10-m Keck telescope (Mauna Kea, Hawaii, USA) obtained a spectrum
of a quasar that was sufficiently detailed to determine an upper limit to the
temperature of the CMBR at the corresponding epoch, about 3.4 billion years
after the Big Bang.


However, a major difficulty of such observations is the necessity to exclude
other sources of excitation (heating). It is well known that some other physical
processes may also affect the observed absorption lines, such as collisions
between the atoms and heating by the ultraviolet light emitted by young and hot
stars.


The main problem is therefore to disentangle the various effects in order to
"isolate" that of the CMBR. This can only be achieved by means of exceptionally
"clean" and detailed spectra of these faint objects, a demanding task. For that
reason all previous measurements have only led to upper limits on the CMBR
temperature.


The new VLT spectrum of the quasar PKS 1232+0815 provides the long hoped-for
break-through in this important area of cosmological research.


On its way to us, the light from this distant object is absorbed by
intervening material, among other by a gaseous cloud in a galaxy at high
redshift (z = 2.34). This distance corresponds to a cosmic time when the
Universe was less than one fifth of its present age.


Another detailed analysis allowed the determination of the physical
conditions in the cloud - the presence of molecular hydrogen lines was crucial
for this to succeed. It clearly showed that the excitation process of atomic
collisions couldn't be solely responsible for the shape and strength of the
observed absorption lines. An additional source of heat must be present and this
can only be the heating by the CMBR.


Moreover, it was possible to place constraints on the effect of other
possible excitation processes. This made it possible for the astronomers to
derive the temperature T of the CMBR at this large distance and early cosmic
epoch and to place a very firm lower limit on this temperature. The final result
is that T is hotter than 6 K and cooler than 14 K; this is in full agreement
with the Big Bang prediction of T = 9 K.


This is thus the first real proof that the CMBR was indeed warmer in the
past.


Source: Press Release





4- When the Cosmic Crunch to the Universe occurs, the Day of
Judgment shall come:


Please also visit: The Miracle of the Space Fabric
-
Mentioned in the Glorious Quran and confirmed by
Science.


Let us look at what Allah Almighty said about the "Cosmic Crunch" Theory:


يوم نطوي السماء كطي السجل للكتب كما بدأنا أول خلق نعيده وعدا علينا إنا كنا
فعلين


"The Day that We roll up the heavens like a scroll rolled up for
books (completed),
- even as We produced the first creation, so
shall We produce a new one: a promise We have undertaken: truly shall We fulfill
it. (The Noble Quran, 21:104)"


Notice here how Allah Almighty Said that He will ROLL BACK the heavens like a
scroll rolled up.






NASA's discovery only 8 years ago!

The following link and quote were sent to me by brother Usman; may
Allah Almighty always be pleased with him.


"The simplest version of the inflationary
theory, an extension of the Big Bang theory,
predicts that the density of the universe is very close to the critical density,
and that the geometry of the universe is flat, like a sheet
of paper.
That is the result confirmed by the WMAP science." (http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html)

They
have discovered only 8 years ago; that the Universe is flat! The best way
the NASA scientists could describe the Universe is "like a sheet of
paper," which Allah Almighty has already described 1,400 years ago to a
goat herder and illiterate Bedouin and Shepard, our beloved and blessed Prophet
Muhammad, Peace, Mercy and Blessings be upon him. Ameen.


From: Ozee JR <usmantech@hotmail.com>
Subject:
RE: A New Miracle of Quran subhanAllah, Not yet found by anyone - NOT A Useless
email inshAllah Trust me. - NASA/TIME/BBC
To: quransearchcom@yahoo.com
Date:
Saturday, April 11, 2009, 8:31 AM








As'salamu Alaikum dear brother Osama,

You are the
first one I am telling, besides my brother, This miracle I have not
found documented anywhere and Science found this about 8 years
ago only !!!!!!! Confirmed By NASA and the links I will give you will be
NASA/TIME/BBC

( 21:104) - The Day that we roll up the heavens
like a scroll rolled up for books (completed)

1.
Allah is comparing the Universe to a Scroll of Paper, 1400 years
ago. And see what the best scientists in the world at NASA found out in
the 21st CENTURY !!!! 2001 !!!

"and
that the geometry of the universe is flat, like a sheet of paper" - NASA
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html

They
have found out only 8 years ago that Universe is flat and the best way NASA
scentist use to describe to a layman is like a sheet of paper , Allah describes
the universe as a scroll 1400 years ago !!! Who can know something that scentist
were only able to find out 8 years ago ?? Arab goat herders ? or the One who has
first hand knowledge of it ? The Creater Allah that Abraham , Moses, Jesus,
Mohammed prayed to ?

THIS IS NOT A THEORY

From the
same NASA Page:
"That is the result confirmed by the WMAP science.

Measurements from WMAP

The WMAP spacecraft can measure the basic parameters of the Big Bang theory including the geometry of the universe. If the
universe were open, the brightest microwave background fluctuations (or "spots") would be about
half a degree across. If the universe were flat, the spots would be about 1
degree across. While if the universe were closed, the brightest spots would be
about 1.5 degrees across.
Recent measurements (c. 2001) by a number of
ground-based and balloon-based experiments, including MAT/TOCO, Boomerang, Maxima, and DASI, have shown that the brightest spots are
about 1 degree across. Thus the universe was known to be flat to within about
15% accuracy prior to the WMAP results. WMAP has confirmed this result with very
high accuracy and precision. We now know that the universe is flat with only a 2% margin of
error."


Also:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/727073.stm
http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101010625/story.html


2.
Yun Wang1
, Jan Michael Kratochvil
, Andrei Linde2
, and
Marina Shmakova3
Department of Physics & Astronomy,
Univ. of
Oklahoma

Have written a detailed scientific paper on end of
Universe:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409264
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0409/0409264v2.pdf

Abstract
In
a broad class of dark energy models, the universe may collapse within a finite
time tc. Here
we study a representative model of dark energy with a linear
potential, V (φ) = V0(1 + αφ). This
model is the simplest doomsday model, in
which the universe collapses rather quickly after it stops
expanding.
Observational data from type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), cosmic microwave
background
anisotropy (CMB), and large scale structure (LSS) are
complementary in constraining dark energy
models. Using the new SN Ia data
(Riess sample), the CMB data from WMAP, and the LSS data
from 2dF, we find
that the collapse time of the universe is tc > ∼ 42 (24) gigayears from today
at 68%
(95%) confidence.
PACS numbers: 98.80.Cq, 11.25.-w,
04.65.+e

Allah likens the end of universe roll up the heavens like
a scroll rolled up for books ,
a scroll takes a long time to write
(relatively) and once written it is rolled up very very quickly (relatively).
This is what
these sceintists have found out in 2008 !!! I will not go into
this too much as this is too complicated a topic for me and should be
taken
as something of interest.

also on expansion

Allahsays in the Holy Quran what means " And it is We Who have
constructed the heaven with might, and verily, it is We Who are steadily
expanding it.
(Qur'an, 51:47)

And also Allah uses the word
we have constructed the heaven with might, as we all know scientifically no
citation required that heaven was created with incredible energy and force, an
imposter god/holy book would have used the words we constructed the heavens
with ease, no problem for any god, easy job, i dont need might I am
God. But Allah describes that massive energy was required for the creation
of the Earth.

I think I am going to revisit each and ever miracle
and reanalyze them :)

Please reply if you find this useful and any
comments where I might have gone wrong or misunderstood something.


Allah Hafiz
Usman




The following article http://www.bigear.org/vol1no4/wheeler.htm, which contains an
interview with a Scientist, Professor John Archibald Wheeler, who was a
colleague of Albert Einstein, explains the Noble Verse above in good details.


Important Note: Before we go into the article,
it is important to know that Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him had also talked
about the "Cosmic Crunch" Theory by predicting that the Sun around the time of
the Cosmic Crunch's occurrence would rise from the West and set in the East due
to a change in our orbit's rotation. Who knows, perhaps the "Cosmic
Crunch" would cause the Earth to flip upside down, which would cause the sun to
rise from the West and set in the East, or perhaps it would change the rotation
of the sun and its planets all together:


Narrated Abu Dhar: "The Prophet asked me at sunset, 'Do you know where
the sun goes (at the time of sunset)?' I replied, 'Allah and His Apostle know
better.' He said, 'It goes (i.e. travels) till it prostrates Itself underneath
the Throne and takes the permission to rise again, and it is permitted and then
(a time will come when) it will be about to prostrate itself but its prostration
will not be accepted, and it will ask permission to go on its course but it will
not be permitted, but it will be ordered to return whence it has come
and so it will rise in the west.
And that is the interpretation of
the Statement of Allah: 'And the sun Runs its fixed course For a term (decreed).
that is The Decree of (Allah) The Exalted in Might, The All-Knowing.'
(36.38) (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Beginning of Creation, Volume 4,
Book 54, Number 421)"


Narrated Abu Huraira: "Allah's Apostle said, 'The Hour will not be
established........and till the sun rises from the West. So when
the sun will rise and the people will see it (rising from the West) they will
all believe (embrace Islam) but that will be the time when: (As Allah said,) 'No
good will it do to a soul to believe then, if it believed not before, nor earned
good (by deeds of righteousness) through its Faith.' (6.158)
And the
Hour will be established while two men spreading a garment in front of them but
they will not be able to sell it, nor fold it up; and the Hour will be
established when a man has milked his she-camel and has taken away the milk but
he will not be able to drink it; and the Hour will be established before a man
repairing a tank (for his livestock) is able to water (his animals) in it; and
the Hour will be established when a person has raised a morsel (of food) to his
mouth but will not be able to eat it.' (Translation of Sahih Bukhari,
Afflictions and the End of the World, Volume 9, Book 88, Number 237)"


"The Day ye shall see it, every mother giving suck shall forget her
suckling-babe, and every pregnant female shall drop her load (unformed): thou
shalt see mankind as in a drunken riot, yet not drunk: but dreadful
will be the Wrath of God.
(The Noble Quran, 22:2)"



Is it possible for the sun to rise from the West and for the
moon to be swallowed by the sun relatively quickly?


See what Western Scientists say about this.




Continuing with the article......


Cosmic Search Vol. 1 No. 4


FORUM: John A. Wheeler


From the Big Bang to the Big Crunch





Scientist-philosopher, teacher-cosmologist, father of the Black Hole,
Wheeler's thoughts encompass the entire cosmos from the Big Bang to the Big
Crunch.


This exclusive interview with John A. Wheeler was made by Mirjana R.
Gearhart of COSMIC SEARCH.





COSMIC SEARCH: You have often commented that the greatest discoveries
of science are yet to come. What do you have in mind?


Wheeler: To me, the greatest discovery yet to come will be to find how
this universe, coming into being from a Big Bang, developed its laws of
operation. I call this "Law without Law" [Or "Order from Disorder"].


COSMIC SEARCH: Could you explain further?


Wheeler: One of the biggest problems is how to state the problem. It's
an old saying that the minute you can state a problem correctly you understand
90 percent of the problem. One of the greatest problems concerns the meaning of
measurement or observation. According to quantum theory, measurements can
influence what happens. The fact that it is difficult to talk about this problem
in an easy way suggests that we have much to learn.


This is a partial response to your question. Putting it another way:


How can we possibly imagine the universe with all its regularities and its
laws coming into being out of something utterly helter-skelter,
higgledy-piggledy and random?


Or, in still another form:


If you were the Lord constructing the universe, how would you have gone about
it?


COSMIC SEARCH: That certainly is a very deep question.


Wheeler: It's inspiring to read the life of Charles Darwin and think
how the division of plant and animal kingdoms, all this myriad of order, came
about through the miracles of evolution, natural selection and chance mutation.
To me this is a marvelous indication that you can get order by starting with
disorder.


COSMIC SEARCH: Do you think there can be any progress on this problem?


Wheeler: One of the conditions, I think, for advance in this field, as
in any field, is believing that advance is possible. What I hope I'm creating is
a sense of faith that it can be done. Faith is the number one element. It isn't
something that spreads itself uniformly. Faith is concentrated in a few people
at particular times and places. If you can involve young people in an atmosphere
of hope and faith, then I think they'll figure out how to get the answer. Faith
and hope are absolutely central to everything one does.


You need people who have imagination, daring and the ability to get
somewhere. That, to me, is the way research works.


Of course another point to all of this is to keep in touch with key ideas,
with what people are doing. Make sure you aren't overlooking something. Here's
where it's so important to talk with the young people. Some modest young person
comes along with some idea no one else is paying any attention to. His idea may
just be the central point.


I'm very fortunate that at Austin, the University of Texas has been willing
to finance this kind of work, bringing in two or three people each year for a
period of time. So, we'll see what happens.


COSMIC SEARCH: You were a colleague of Albert Einstein. We are
celebrating the 100th anniversary of his birth this year. When did you first
meet him?


Wheeler: October 1933, the month he took up permanent residence in the
U.S. was my first meeting with Einstein. Then in 1953, when I first started to
teach relativity at Princeton, he was kind enough to invite me to bring my
students around to his house for discussions. So, we sat around the dining room
table and his secretary, Helen Dukas, and his stepdaughter, Margot, brought tea
and the students asked him questions.


COSMIC SEARCH: Are there some tenets of his that stand out in your
mind?


Wheeler: Yes, his work revolved around three rules which apply to all
science, our problems, and times:



  1. Out of clutter, find simplicity;

  2. From discord make harmony; and finally

  3. In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity.

COSMIC SEARCH: You began your work in relativity about that time then?








[Einstein, Yukawa and Wheeler in 1954]Albert Einstein, Hidekei Yukawa and John A. Wheeler at Princeton in 1954.
Yukawa received the Nobel prize in physics in
1949.


Wheeler: Yes, it was about the period 1952-53-54-55, Einstein's last
four years, when l was just getting into relativity. The thing that really got
me into it more than anything else was this concern about what happens to a
cloud of matter when it collapses. What's the final state?


I had not yet invented the term "black hole". I hadn't yet realized how
important it was to attach a name to this concept.


COSMIC SEARCH: How did you come up with the name "black hole"?


Wheeler: It was an act of desperation, to force people to believe in
it. It was in 1968, at the time of the discussion of whether pulsars were
related to neutron stars or to these completely collapsed objects. I wanted a
way of emphasizing that these objects were real. Thus, the name "black hole".








[Black Hole Angular Momentum Diagram]Diagrammatic representation of a black hole suggesting how space is
curved or warped by its enormous gravitational pull. All details of infalling
material are wiped out in the black hole, only the net mass, charge and angular
momentum remaining. A black hole is the ultimate trash
compactor.


The Russians used the term frozen star -- their point of attention was how it
looked from the outside, where the material moves much more slowly until it
comes to a horizon. [Or critical distance. From inside this distance there is
no escape.]
But, from the point of view of someone who's on the material
itself, falling in, there's nothing special about the horizon. He keeps on going
in. There's nothing frozen about what happens to him. So, I felt that that
aspect of it needed more emphasis.


COSMIC SEARCH: A few years ago you asked the question: "Are life and
mind irrelevant to the structure of the universe, or are they central to it?"


Have you found an answer?


Wheeler: No, I'm one of the most baffled men in the world on this
subject. There is a line of investigation involving the anthropic (or
man-related) principle
-- the idea that the universe has to be much as it is
or life would be impossible. Not only life as we know it, but any life at all
would be impossible. On what else can a comprehensible universe be built but the
demand for comprehensibility?


My Princeton colleague, Robert Dicke, expressed it this way:


What good is a universe without somebody around to look at it?


That, to be sure, was an old idea, going back not only to the Bishop Berkeley
of the time of Newton, but all the way back to Parmenides, the precursor of
Socrates and Plato.


But it was new in the form that Dicke put it. He said if you want an observer
around, you need life, and if you want life, you need heavy elements. To make
heavy elements out of hydrogen, you need thermonuclear combustion. To have
thermonuclear combustion, you need a time of cooking in a star of several
billion years. In order to stretch out several billion years in its time
dimension, the universe, according to general relativity, must be several
billion years across in its space dimensions.


So why is the universe as big as it is? Because we're here!


COSMIC SEARCH: A very interesting view.


Wheeler: You could put it another way: You can say there's an
efficiency expert who's come to look over the Lord's shoulder. He says,


"Why, Lord, you're wasting a lot of money on this universe. See, you've put
one hundred billion (10^11) stars in the Milky Way, and you've put one hundred
billion (10^11) Milky Ways in the universe -- that's ten billion trillion
(10^11) stars -- that's a mighty extravagant way to get one planet (the Earth)
with life on it so there'll be somebody around to be aware of this universe.
Now, Lord, we efficiency people want to cut you down, but we won't cut you down
to one star. Instead of 10 billion trillion stars, we'll cut you down to one
hundred billion stars -- that's enough to make one galaxy. This will be a great
economy move."









[The Complete Story of the Universe]
"The universe starts with a Big Bang, expands to a maximum dimension,
then recontracts and collapses (to the Big Crunch); no more awe-inspiring
prediction was ever made." Quotation from Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne and
John A. Wheeler in "Gravitation", W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1973, page
1196.



From me, Osama Abdallah: Please visit
Allah
Almighty said in the Noble Quran that He is "Expanding" the
Universe.


continuing with the article....


The only problem is, according to general relativity, when you cut the amount
of mass down by a factor of 100 billion, you also cut the size of the universe
down by the same amount, just enough universe for one galaxy. You also cut down
the time from the Big Bang to the Big Crunch from 100 billion years to just one
year which isn't time enough to evolve even one star, let alone evolve life.


Put it another way. There's no obvious extravagance of scale in the
construction of the universe. The efficiency expert would have a right to
complain if life had been created on several planets, in several parts of the
universe, because then he could say that's more than you really need in order
for somebody to be around to be aware of the universe. But, if you have life on
one planet only (the Earth), then, it's not obvious that you're being
extravagant.


The anthropic principle provides a new perspective on the question of life
elsewhere in space. It puts in question the common view that the universe is a
big machine; that man is unimportant in the scheme of things; that we're an
accidental bit of dust that doesn't have anything to do with it all. From that
point of view, it is not very important whether you're going to have life on a
billion planets or on just one planet -- or no life at all. Life or no life
still wouldn't matter in the scheme of the universe.


But, if we adopt this other perspective that Dicke suggests -- the anthropic
principle -- then it's quite a different assessment that we make. Then the
universe has to be such as to permit awareness of that universe; otherwise the
universe has no meaning.


We are now nearer the Big Bang than the Big Crunch since the universe, as we
observe it, is still expanding.


The anthropic principle looks at this universe, that universe and the other
universe and rules out as mere meaningless machines all those in which awareness
does not develop somewhere at some time. Stronger than the anthropic principle
is what I might call the participatory principle. According to it we
could not even imagine a universe that did not somewhere and for some stretch of
time contain observers because the very building materials of the universe are
these acts of observer-participancy. You wouldn't have the stuff out of which to
build the universe otherwise. This participatory principle takes for its
foundation the absolutely central point of the quantum:


No elementary phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is an observed (or
registered) phenomenon.


COSMIC SEARCH: You also collaborated with Niels Bohr. Could you tell
us about him?


Wheeler: As a student in 1934, 1 applied for a fellowship to go to
Copenhagen to study with Bohr. I remember writing down my reason on the
application:


"Bohr sees further ahead in physics than any other man alive".


My fellowship was granted and the next year I went to study with Bohr, the
great leader of physics and father figure of all physicists. There in
Copenhagen, Christian Moller, just back from Rome, reported Fermi's results on
the capture of slow neutrons. Bohr immediately became terribly concerned, and
interrupting Moller, talked and talked while walking back and forth. All the
while you could see the liquid drop model of the nucleus taking shape right
there before your eyes. For him no physics was of any interest unless it yielded
some paradox or some beautiful way of seeing things simply.


I do not remember anyone at Bohr's institute who ever succeeded in finishing
a seminar talk, even though he was the invited speaker. He might be able to
speak fifteen minutes, but soon Bohr would take over and would use the whole
time discussing the meaning of the speaker's results and what they proved or
disproved.


COSMIC SEARCH: You were also involved with Bohr later, weren't you?


Wheeler: Yes, I was down at the pier in New York on January 16,1939,
to meet him, and I had hardly said "Hello" when I learned that just before his
ship left Copenhagen, he had been told of the discovery of nuclear fission by
Hahn and Strassmann. So we dropped everything else and started to work on
fission.


During the war I met Bohr in Washington at the time he was dividing his time
between Los Alamos and Washington. He told me confidentially about his
discussions with President Roosevelt about the future of nuclear energy. He told
me about his efforts to work out some kind of control of nuclear energy after
the war.


Bohr made a great impression on Roosevelt and they had several discussions.
The last speech Roosevelt wrote -- he died while he was still working on it --
had in it some words, quoted by Roosevelt from Thomas Jefferson, about how
scientists serve as indispensable means of communication for bringing peace
between different countries of the world.


It was enormously impressive to me to see Bohr's courage in facing up to what
the great questions were. I can vividly remember him saying to me:


"I must always seem to you like an amateur. But I am always an amateur."


Of course, that is a very modest way of saying that one is a pioneer, an
explorer. If you are working on something new, then you are necessarily an
amateur.


COSMIC SEARCH: Niels Bohr created one of the world's most influential
schools of modem physics in Copenhagen. You, too, have educated many leading
physicists, both in nuclear physics and in general relativity, at Princeton. Do
you have some thoughts about educating students?


Wheeler: Shouldn't you rephrase your question? After all, I'm sure
that it is really the students who educate me! We all know that the real reason
universities have students is to educate the professors. But, in order to be
educated by the students, one has to put good questions to them. You try out
your questions on the students. If there are questions that the students get
interested in, then they start to tell you new things and keep you asking more
new questions. Pretty soon you have learned a great deal.


COSMIC SEARCH: What insights can one gain from the collapse of a star
into a black hole as regards the ultimate collapse of the universe?


Wheeler: I would regard the black hole as a here-and-now model for the
collapse of the universe. We've come to recognize that in the typical closed
model universe, a black hole that forms at some point in the history of the
universe is not a singularity -- a Gate of Time -- separate and distinct from
the Big Crunch, but is part and parcel of the same thing.








[Ice Cave Diagram]"Think of yourself in an ice cave with time pointing upward from the
floor (the Big Bang). The roof represents the Big Crunch and the icicles
represent black holes. The water level represents the time where we are now,
beginning to engulf a few icicles. That's when black holes are
formed."


Let me put it this way. If you'll permit, let's imagine ourselves as in an
ice cave, and let's think of time as pointing upward from the floor. The floor
of ice represents the Big Bang. The roof of ice represents the Big Crunch -- and
some spikes hanging down, icicles, represent black holes. Think of water
gradually filling the cave as it comes up, representing the advance of time. No
water, and you're back at the Big Bang; a little water, and you're in the early
days of the universe. More water and your time level is where we are now. As the
water rises -- as time goes on -- it engulfs a few of the spikes, the icicles --
that's the moment when black holes are formed. Keep the water level going on up
and you get to the point where the spikes are completely immersed and the water
even reaches to the top of the cave. Then you have arrived at the Big Crunch.
From this point of view, you can see that the Big Crunch or final Gate of Time
is not distinct in nature from the black hole. They're the same kind of animal.
In that sense, learning about a black hole is learning about the final stages of
the universe.


Although many articles are being written about the outsides of black holes,
hardly any deal with the question of what happens inside the black hole,
on the way to the Big Crunch. All the indications I can see point to it being
the direct opposite of what happens on the outside. The outside settles down to
a steady standard condition. If it's perturbed a little bit away from that ideal
state, it once again reverts to the steady condition.


But, on the inside, the condition is the exact opposite, in the sense that if
the collapse of matter is not exactly symmetric, then the perturbations from the
infalling matter will get worse and worse, and bigger and bigger. There will be
so-called "mixmaster" oscillations. Matter -- and space geometry as well -- will
be driven into a gigantic chaos. If, as we believe, the black hole is really
part and parcel of the final singularity, then these "mixmaster" oscillations
should be a common property of black holes and the big crunch. We have much to
learn from studying this chaos from the theoretical end. That doesn't mean these
extreme conditions have no observational consequences; they certainly do.


One might question this point. One might ask, what sense is it to talk about
the physics inside a black hole? Who's ever going to fall inside a black hole?
But, here we are living inside -- if Einstein is correct -- a closed universe,
and we will eventually head into a Big Crunch ourselves -- so the laugh's on us!


COSMIC SEARCH: If that is true -- that the last laugh is on us, how
does that affect mankind's attitude?


Wheeler: If the universe is only going to last for a finite time, I
think it's far too early in the scheme of things to try to draw conclusions
about how we should react. We're still so much in the learning phase. We have to
keep separate what we're learning from our attitudes.


To me to live a one-life-only in a one-life-only universe provides a poetic
parallelism. How precious life is! Every day, every person one meets, every
experience -- that's all we're going to have. It distresses me that so many
people go through life in an alienated spirit, not realizing that this is the
only opportunity they have -- they'll never have it again.


COSMIC SEARCH: We certainly are at a very important time in mankind's
thinking about its place in the universe. Thank you, Professor Wheeler, for
sharing with us a glimpse of these great discoveries yet to come.





[John A. Wheeler]

John Archibald Wheeler has been at the forefront of
theoretical physics for nearly five decades. In the 1930's, with Niels Bohr, he
developed the first general theory of nuclear fission.








[Liquid Drop Diagram]According to the "liquid drop" model of Bohr and Wheeler (1939), a slow
neutron entering a uranium 235 nucleus causes it to split like a drop of liquid
into two smaller drops representing the nuclei of a tellurium 137 atom and a
zirconium 97 atom while emitting two neutrons. Energy released by this type of
reaction forms the basis of nuclear fission
power.


In the 1940's, with a student, Richard Feynman, he discovered a new approach
to electrodynamics which has proven to be of great value. In the 1950's he found
new solutions to Einstein's gravitational equations of importance in
astrophysics. In the 1960s he pioneered studies involving gravitational
collapse, neutron stars and Black Holes (a name he invented). More recently
Wheeler has proposed and analyzed "delayed choice" experiments. In them a
difference in what one measures on the particle -- or photon -- now makes
an irretrievable difference in what one has the right to say the particle
already did in the past. This effect, which makes it impossible to
monitor the events of nature with complete detachment, he calls
"observer-participancy".


Wheeler is a scientist-philosopher whose thoughts encompass the entire cosmos
from its smallest microstructure to its astronomical maximum, while spanning its
past and future between the two "Gates of Time": the "Big Bang" beginning and
the "Big Crunch" ending. The Gates of Time is also a term he coined. Wheeler's
dynamic career gives special meaning to the statement that scientists are even
more interesting than science.


Wheeler is Director of the Center for Theoretical Physics at the University
of Texas, Austin. Before going to Austin in 1976, he was the Joseph Henry
Professor of Physics at Princeton University, where he had been a faculty member
for 38 years.


Born in Florida in 1911, he received his doctorate from Johns Hopkins
University in 1933. In 1938 he joined the physics faculty of Princeton
University where he served until his move to Austin in 1976. Wheeler is past
president of the American Physical Society, recipient of the Albert Einstein
Prize of the Strauss Foundation (1965), the Enrico Fermi Award for his work on
nuclear fission (presented by President Lyndon Johnson in 1968), the Franklin
Medal of the Franklin Institute (1969), and the National Medal of Science
(1971), as well as numerous honorary degrees.


He is the author of many scientific articles and author or co-author of six
books. His famous, monumental 1280-page text "Gravitation" (1973) was written in
collaboration with his former students Kip Thorne and Charles Misner; his most
recent, "Frontiers of Time", appeared in 1979.


A man of great modesty, Wheeler radiates a contagious enthusiasm coupled with
a charming informality. He has a fondness for paradox as epitomized by: "We will
first understand how simple the universe is when we recognize how strange it
is".





Wheeler on Science



  • "The greatest discoveries are yet to come."
  • "What good is a universe without somebody around to look at it?"
  • "There's no obvious extravagance of scale in the construction of the
    universe."
  • "If you're working on something new, then you are necessarily an amateur."
  • "So, why is the universe as big as it is? Because we're here!"
  • Learning about a black hole is learning about the final stages of the
    universe."
  • "You have to keep separate what we're learning from our attitudes"
  • "We will first understand how simple the universe is when we recognize how
    strange it is."
  • "The real reason universities have students is to educate the professors."
  • "You need people who have the imagination, daring and ability to get
    somewhere. That is the way research works. "
  • "No elementary phenomenon is a phenomenon until it is an observed
    phenomenon. "






Back to Science
in the Noble Quran and Islam.


The Miracle of the Space Fabric - Mentioned in the Glorious
Quran and confirmed by Science.


Life
originated from water in the Noble Quran.


Allah
Almighty said in the Noble Quran that He is "Expanding" the
Universe.



AUDIOs from Dr. Zaghlool Al-Najjar


Lack of Oxygen and low air pressure in space.


The constant reduction of earth's size: The earth used to be
200 times bigger!


The location of the lowest land on earth.


Iron was sent down to earth from space.



The origins of the Universe, Big Bang theory, Cosmic Crunch, and
the creation of the SECOND EARTH after the second Big Bang in the Noble Quran
and Science.
Also, Dr. Zaghlool's scientific explanation of the earth
and heaven coming to Allah Almighty "willingly or unwillingly" and how each
celestial object behaves differently depending on its mass.


The Cosmic Crunch and the creation of the second Universe
and second earth.


Time and the Speed of Light precisely
calculated and mentioned in the Noble Quran.


Is it possible for the sun to rise from the West and for the
moon to be swallowed by the sun relatively quickly?

See what Western
Scientists say about this.




0 comments: